• Email:info@mothersandothersforcleanair.org
  • Look Up Local Air Quality
  • Give Your Gift Today
Mothers & Others for Clean Air
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Our Story
    • What We Do
    • Board of Directors
    • Contact Us
  • Fight for Clean Air
    • Take Action!
    • Events
    • Healthy Air is Healthcare
    • Schools
  • Stay Informed
    • Why Does Healthy Indoor Air Matter?
    • Clean Air News
    • Research Hub
    • Environmental Racism
  • Resources
    • Resource Library
    • Videos For Sharing
    • Conversations and Webinars
    • Films
    • Healthy Indoor Breathing Toolkit
  • Join Us
    • Get Our Updates
    • Tell Us Your Story
    • Give
  • Media
    • Press
    • MOCA in the News
Sign Up For Updates
Ecoife Logo
Mothers & Others for Clean Air
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Our Story
    • What We Do
    • Board of Directors
    • Contact Us
  • Fight for Clean Air
    • Take Action!
    • Events
    • Healthy Air is Healthcare
    • Schools
  • Stay Informed
    • Why Does Healthy Indoor Air Matter?
    • Clean Air News
    • Research Hub
    • Environmental Racism
  • Resources
    • Resource Library
    • Videos For Sharing
    • Conversations and Webinars
    • Films
    • Healthy Indoor Breathing Toolkit
  • Join Us
    • Get Our Updates
    • Tell Us Your Story
    • Give
  • Media
    • Press
    • MOCA in the News

An integrated life cycle assessment and life cycle cost (LCC) model was developed to compare the life cycle performance of plug-in charging versus wireless charging for an electric bus system. The model was based on a bus system simulation using existing transit bus routes in the Ann Arbor–Ypsilanti metro area in Michigan. The objective is to evaluate the LCCs for an all-electric bus system utilizing either plug-in or wireless charging and also compare these costs to both conventional pure diesel and hybrid bus systems. Despite a higher initial infrastructure investment for off-board wireless chargers deployed across the service region, the wireless charging bus system has the lowest LCC of US$0.99 per bus-kilometer among the four systems and has the potential to reduce use-phase carbon emissions attributable to the lightweighting benefits of on-board battery downsizing compared to plug-in charging. Further uncertainty analysis and sensitivity analysis indicate that the unit price of battery pack and day or night electricity price are key parameters in differentiating the LCCs between plug-in and wireless charging. Additionally, scenario analyses on battery recycling, carbon emission pricing, and discount rates were conducted to further analyze and compare their respective life cycle performance.


Published Mar 24, 2016

Bi, Z., De Kleine, R., & Keoleian, G. A. (2017). Integrated Life Cycle Assessment and Life Cycle Cost Model for Comparing Plug-in versus Wireless Charging for an Electric Bus System. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 21(2), 344–355. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12419

Read source

Take Action

  • Give Your Gift Today
  • Sign Up for Updates
  • Email Us

About Us

Our mission is to protect children’s health by reducing the impacts of air pollution and climate change throughout the Southeast.
Copyright © 2025 Mothers & Others for Clean Air