• Email:info@mothersandothersforcleanair.org
  • Look Up Local Air Quality
  • Give Your Gift Today
Mothers & Others for Clean Air
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Our Story
    • What We Do
    • Board of Directors
    • Contact Us
  • Fight for Clean Air
    • Take Action!
    • Healthy Air is Healthcare
    • Georgia Public Service Commission
    • Schools
    • Events
  • Stay Informed
    • Why Does Healthy Indoor Air Matter?
    • Clean Air News
    • Research Hub
    • Environmental Racism
  • Resources
    • Resource Library
    • Videos For Sharing
    • Conversations and Webinars
    • Films
    • Healthy Indoor Breathing Toolkit
  • Join Us
    • Get Our Updates
    • Tell Us Your Story
    • Give
  • Media
    • Press
    • MOCA in the News
Sign Up For Updates
Ecoife Logo
Mothers & Others for Clean Air
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Our Story
    • What We Do
    • Board of Directors
    • Contact Us
  • Fight for Clean Air
    • Take Action!
    • Healthy Air is Healthcare
    • Georgia Public Service Commission
    • Schools
    • Events
  • Stay Informed
    • Why Does Healthy Indoor Air Matter?
    • Clean Air News
    • Research Hub
    • Environmental Racism
  • Resources
    • Resource Library
    • Videos For Sharing
    • Conversations and Webinars
    • Films
    • Healthy Indoor Breathing Toolkit
  • Join Us
    • Get Our Updates
    • Tell Us Your Story
    • Give
  • Media
    • Press
    • MOCA in the News

Most of currently reported models for predicting PM2.5 concentrations from satellite retrievals of aerosol optical depth are global methods without considering local variations, which might introduce significant biases into prediction results. In this paper, a geographically weighted regression model was developed to examine the relationship among PM2.5, aerosol optical depth, meteorological parameters, and land use information. Additionally, two meteorological datasets, North American Regional Reanalysis and North American Land Data Assimilation System, were fitted into the model separately to compare their performances. The study area is centered at the Atlanta Metro area, and data were collected from various sources for the year 2003. The results showed that the mean local R2 of the models using North American Regional Reanalysis was 0.60 and those using North American Land Data Assimilation System reached 0.61. The root mean squared prediction error showed that the prediction accuracy was 82.7% and 83.0% for North American Regional Reanalysis and North American Land Data Assimilation System in model fitting, respectively, and 69.7% and 72.1% in cross validation. The results indicated that geographically weighted regression combined with aerosol optical depth, meteorological parameters, and land use information as the predictor variables could generate a better fit and achieve high accuracy in PM2.5 exposure estimation, and North American Land Data Assimilation System could be used as an alternative of North American Regional Reanalysis to provide some of the meteorological fields. © 2012 Elsevier Inc.


Published Nov 3, 2012

Hu, X., Waller, L. A., Al-Hamdan, M. Z., Crosson, W. L., Estes, M. G., Estes, S. M., Quattrochi, D. A., Sarnat, J. A., & Liu, Y. (2013). Estimating ground-level PM2.5 concentrations in the southeastern U.S. using geographically weighted regression. Environmental Research, 121, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2012.11.003

Read source

Take Action

  • Give Your Gift Today
  • Sign Up for Updates
  • Email Us

About Us

Our mission is to protect children’s health by reducing the impacts of air pollution and climate change throughout the Southeast.
Copyright © 2025 Mothers & Others for Clean Air